The Virginia Chiropractic Association and the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research have funded two studies of note: one evaluating chiropractic compared to other specialties; one investigating the effects of mandated insurance coverage for chiropractic treatment.
David H. Dean, Ph.D
Robert M. Schmidt, Ph.D.
Bureau of Disability Economics Research
Robins School of Business
University of Richmond
This study is a nationwide survey to assess costs of six different types of medical providers, including chiropractic, for treating similar back-related conditions.
A detailed cost examination revealed that chiropractors had the lowest average charge per visit (under $16) of the six providers, and the highest percentage of charges paid out-of-pocket by patients (75 percent of cost typical visit is paid by patient, with insurance paying less than $5 per visit).
DCs were the most frequented among the six provider groups for musculoskeletal conditions (nine annual visits), and sprains and strains, (4 annual visits), and thus had the highest annual charges in these categories of the six groups.
Treatment costs for specific conditions, e.g., patients with arthritis, found chiropractic costs significantly lower that the other five practitioner groups. Treatment costs were also lower for disc disorders and various low back conditions with chiropractic, while treatment costs of sprains, strains or dislocations were lower or comparable to the other five practitioner groups.
The study stated: "Costs for chiropractic care do not differ statistically from those incurred for treatment provided solely by general practitioners. Moreover, for many conditions, the specialist had higher costs than the treatment regimen provide by the GP. For instance, treatment of bursitis by internists cost $202 more than what the GP charges. Treatment by surgeons for four conditions adds between $318-436 to annual medical costs. 'Other' physicians added $1,233 to annual treatment charges for disc disorders."
The report concluded: "Chiropractic is a lower cost option for several prominent back-related ailments. This is despite its 'last resort' status for many patients. One explanation for this is the lower insurance coverage of chiropractic care. If chiropractic care is insured to the extent other specialists are stipulated, it may emerge as a first option for patients with certain medical conditions. This could very well result in a decrease in overall treatment costs for these conditions."
Leonard G. Schifrin
Chancellor Professor of Economics
The College of William and Mary
Williamsburg, Virginia
Clinical Professor of Preventive Medicine
Medical College of Virginia
Richmond, Virginia
The Schifrin study examines the effects of mandates on insurance costs, the utilization of chiropractic, and published literature on chiropractic's effectiveness.
The reports reveals that while all 50 states have health insurance mandates, only 37 states have mandated chiropractic services. The insurance mandates in these 37 states provide individuals with insurance coverage for chiropractic that companies and employers would otherwise not include.
The study points out that health insurance mandates are estimated to comprise 20 percent of health insurance outpayments, while the chiropractic mandates increase outpayments by less than one percent.
The current chiropractic patient population is estimated at 9-10 million, and is expected to double in the next few years.
Examining 22 studies and one inquiry (involving 14 states and two foreign countries), the Schifrin study concluded:
"By every test of cost and effectiveness, the general weight of evidence shows chiropractic to provide important therapeutic benefits at economical costs. Additionally, these benefits are achieved with apparently minimal, even negligible impacts on the costs of health insurance. The conclusion of this analysis is that chiropractic mandates help make available health care that is widely used by the American public and has proven to be cost effective."
Virginia Chiropractic Association:
P.O Box 534
Richmond, VA 23204
Phone: (804) 353-8699
or
Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research (FCER) 66 Washington Ave. Des Moines, Iowa 50314 Phone: (800) 622-6309 (515) 282-7118
The FCER is offering the studies for $25 each or $45 for both.
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
