Laser therapy, also known as photobiomodulation (PBM), is a non-invasive modality that delivers red and infrared laser light to biological tissue with the goals of stimulating cellular processes and enhancing the activation of biochemical mechanisms.1 Let's examine the contraindications for laser therapy.
A contraindication is a condition that makes a procedure inadvisable; and may be absolute or relative. An absolute contraindication is a situation that makes a particular treatment absolutely inadvisable, such as shining a therapy laser directly into the eye. A relative contraindication is a condition that makes a particular treatment possibly inadvisable, such as a recent steroid injection.2
NAALT Contraindications
In 2010, the North American Association of Laser Therapy (NAALT) held a membership consensus vote on laser therapy contraindications.3 They are listed as follows:
The absolute contraindication against shining laser light directly into the eyes is the only one that is universally recognized, and should be patently obvious. Now let's examine the NAALT list and more possible PBM contraindications.
Cancer Sites: Yes or No?
First off, what about cancer? In cell culture studies, photobiomodulation has been shown to stimulate cancer cell growth4 and increase the aggressiveness of cancer cells,5 leading many to list cancer as a PBM absolute contraindication.
A 2018 paper by Hamblin examined the question, "Can PBM directly or indirectly attack cancer?" and proposed that PBM could be applied against cancer. Suggested mechanisms included direct tumor killing by high-dose PBM; selective potentiation of tumor killing due to metabolic differences; and stimulation of anti-tumor host immunity.
The Warburg Effect describes the mitochondria of cancer cells changing their metabolism to carry out aerobic glycolysis instead of oxidative phosphorylation, and explains why malignant cells and normal cells behave very differently in response to PBM.
Recent articles have indicated that PBM can increase cancer treatment outcomes and survival in cancer patients;6-9 and PBM is clinically recommended for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients undergoing chemotherapy.10
Hamblin's paper states, "Although there are a few articles suggesting that PBM therapy can be detrimental in animal models of tumors, there are also many articles that suggest the opposite and that light can directly damage the tumor, can potentiate other cancer therapies, and can stimulate the host immune system. Moreover, there are two clinical trials showing increased survival in cancer patients who received PBM therapy." And the paper concluded, "PBM therapy may have benefits in cancer patients and should be further investigated."11
Does this mean we should use laser therapy on all patients with active cancer? No. If a cancer patient is treated with laser and their disease worsens or they pass from the cancer in the near term, could the laser clinic be blamed? While no such cases have occurred in U.S. health care, it is wise to consider. In the end, the doctor will need to use their clinical judgment.
What About Pregnancy?
Pregnancy is listed as a contraindication because caution has historically been exercised with any modality during pregnancy. There is no evidence to support the idea of there being any risk in treating distant regions of the body relative to the uterus.12
In an interesting animal experiment, Avila observed cell damage in chicken embryos after irradiation with a HeNe laser through an opening in the egg. The dosage represented a very high dose of laser irradiation for the size and weight of the chicken egg compared with a human fetus inside a pregnant abdomen of an adult female.
Nevertheless, if any complication occurred after using a therapeutic laser, it could automatically be suspect and leave the clinician with the burden of proof.13 For women who know they're pregnant, about 10-15 percent end in miscarriage.14 And the baseline rate for birth defects in the U.S. is about 3 percent.15
The concept in play with both cancer and pregnancy is, "Correlation does not imply causation": If event A happens and then event B happens, it does not necessarily mean that A caused B. In our case, did PBM cause a cancer to worsen, or a miscarriage, or a birth defect? No, it did not.
Editor's Note: Part 2 of this article (November issue) critiques other potential contraindications to laser therapy; and discusses potential malpractice considerations. Complete references supporting both parts accompany pt. 2.
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
