While research supports the value of spinal manipulation for chronic low back pain when performed by doctors of chiropractic, a new study published in JAMA Network Open suggests doctors of osteopathy and physical therapists don't enjoy the same success.
According to the randomized clinical trial involving 162 young adults (average age: 25 years) with chronic, mild to moderate LBP, both spinal manipulation and mobilization were no more effective than placebo in reducing low back pain and related disability. "Licensed clinicians (either a doctor of osteopathic medicine or physical therapist), with at least 3 years of clinical experience using manipulative therapies provided all treatments."
Participants were randomized into one of three groups and received six treatment sessions of spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization or placebo (sham cold laser) over the course of three weeks (two sessions per week for three weeks). Primary outcome measures assessed included 1) change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score over the past seven days; and 2) change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score 48-72 hours after completion of the six treatments.
In their conclusion, the authors state: "Our findings indicated that spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization were no more effective than a well-chosen placebo in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain. We conclude that these manipulative therapy techniques do not appear to be effective for chronic low back pain, at least among relatively young individuals with mild to moderate back pain."
Interesting ... but what if the treating clinicians had been doctors of chiropractic? Here are just a few of the studies supporting chiropractic spinal manipulation for chronic LBP:
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
