The profession of chiropractic faces an unprecedented challenge in Texas, an attack that is more aggressive, sustained and dangerous than anything previously seen. The medical lobby has launched a coordinated, multi-front assault. If left unchecked, this assault will not only be extremely damaging to the practice of chiropractic in the Lone Star State, but also will have national and international repercussions, as a victorious and emboldened medical lobby will undoubtedly seek to expand this fight to other states and even other nations.
The complexity, coordination and timing of these efforts lead me to suspect a synchronized, calculated attempt by medicine to destabilize and damage the practice of chiropractic in Texas.
In past battles with the Texas Medical Association (TMA), Texas chiropractors have lost the use of the term chiropractic physician, as well as the right to perform vestibular-ocular-nystagmus (VON) testing, manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), and needle electromyography. While these procedures are not used broadly by most chiropractors, their loss did show the medical lobby that it could reduce and eliminate portions of the scope of chiropractic practice.
Heartened by these victories, the TMA is now trying to eviscerate the scope of chiropractic practice in Texas. It is my hope that DCs in the U.S. and other countries will recognize that this battle is a renewal of the Byzantine practice of organized medicine to restrict our freedom to practice and restrict our patients' access to chiropractic care. You may recall that in September 1987, the AMA and 1,900 local and county medical associations were found guilty of violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act in an attempt to "contain and eliminate" the chiropractic profession (Wilk v. American Medical Association, 1990).1
The current battlefield in Texas is fluid and complex. Here is an overview of what is happening:
What Makes Texas State Politics Unique?
It appears the medical lobby has identified that chiropractic in this state is particularly vulnerable to attack, given their clout as well as the unique system of laws and regulation in Texas. Though the problems we are facing in the state are complex, I'll attempt to clarify some of the uniquely Texan political aspects of the governmental landscape.
1. The TMA has a particularly strong medical lobby. Texas has more medical doctors in its state House than any other state. It has six, all Republicans: three in the state Senate and three in the state House.3
From my time in the U.S. Capitol, I know congressmen and congresswomen frequently defer to colleagues they consider subject matter experts. It is common for a lawmaker to defer to another lawmaker who is a medical physician in matters dealing with health care.
This gives the medical profession an expanded voice in Texas politics. Three more medical doctors have announced their intention to run for the state House in the 2018 elections; if they win, this will further strengthen the medical lobby.
2. Lawsuits. The TMA is currently in a legal battle with the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners to remove diagnosis from chiropractic. The TMA has a long history of lawsuits intended to restrict the scope of practice of all non-MD / DO professions. Right now, TCA is fighting to keep the use of diagnosis; treatment of nerves and neuromusculoskeletal conditions; manipulation under anesthesia; and vestibular-ocular-nystagmus (VON) testing. The TCA is also appealing a decision in which the definition of the subluxation complex has been narrowed.
3. The Scope of Practice Partnership. The SOPP, while not a uniquely Texas organization, has had great influence in the state. It was formed in 2006 by the American Medical Association to limit scope-of-practice expansions by non-MD / DO physicians. The TMA has been a charter member of this organization and is essentially its attack dog.
But chiropractors should not feel alone in the attacks on our scope of practice. The SOPP and the TMA have also campaigned against the scope of nurses, midwives, podiatrists, physical therapists and others. They don't like competition. The AMA's SOPP strategically funds battles with the greatest likelihood of success. Apparently, the scope of practice of chiropractors in Texas seems to be worth the fight to the AMA. Make no mistake about it: if we lose this battle in Texas, the SOPP will fund battles in other states.
4. The Sunset Advisory Commission. In an attempt to limit unbridled bureaucracy, the state of Texas created the Texas Sunset Act in 1977. According to this act, every regulatory agency will automatically be abolished (hence, there is a "sunset" to its existence) at the end of a 12-year cycle unless the legislators vote to keep the agency.
Approximately 130 state agencies are subject to the Sunset Act. This year, the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners is due to enter the sunset review process. During this time of review, the Sunset Commission can make changes to the management directives of the agency.
After the commission agrees on the proposed fate of the reviewed agency, it is presented to the general session for a vote. This commission is charged with the task to look for weakness in an agency: "Sunset reviews also focus on identifying areas of weakness in an agency's operations and recommending specific solutions for improvement through changes in law and management directives to an agency's leadership."4
5. Limited legislative sessions. The Texas legislative body meets only every other year, in the odd-numbered years, for five months. This schedule for the legislative body dates back to the days of the Old West, when the preferred method of travel was horseback. At a time when it could take weeks to travel to Austin from the far reaches of the state, it made sense to meet only every other year.
Retaining this archaic schedule means it can take much longer in Texas to challenge and undo actions taken by the legislature. In addition, because such actions are in place for a minimum of two years, changes can take on inertia and become much harder to undo once implemented.
6. Low pay of Texas legislators. The pay for lawmakers in Texas is low: $600 per month, plus $125 per day when they are in session or traveling during official business. This low wage and short (140 days every other year) legislative season lends itself to attract those who can leave their jobs for five months and do not need the money (or have a strong sense of civic duty and are willing to make the sacrifice).
This wage may discourage middle-class citizens from seeking state office, thus attracting a particular elite or poor segment of society, rather than a diverse population. Only the rich or the poor can afford to serve as Texas state lawmakers.
Since running a campaign is expensive, government office in Texas is slanted toward the well-off versus those with lower financial reserves. This situation results in a demographic among Texas legislators that is likely to include more members of the medical profession and more bias against non-medical entities.
Time to "Stand in the Gap"
Texas is the second largest state in the union by both population and area. Politically and symbolically, a major defeat in Texas will have far-reaching consequences. This battle is against chiropractors everywhere, and while the profession has a reputation for circling the wagons and shooting inward, this fight should mobilize our forces and field our army.
Lose the battle in Texas, and our enemies will quickly move on to the next state. To quote Benjamin Franklin at the signing of the Declaration of Independence, "We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately."
To quote another founding father, Thomas Jefferson is attributed as saying, "The cost of freedom is eternal vigilance." This fight will never end; it is eternal, just like our commitment to our patients. Part of being a master clinician is to be an advocate for our patients. This is the time to become that advocate.
Be assured that we at Parker University will do everything in our power to represent the interests of the university, our students and our alumni in order to preserve the rights of all chiropractors in Texas to practice the art and science of chiropractic as effectively and efficiently as possible.
We have a serious battle ahead of us, one that will require the resolve of every member of the chiropractic community to guarantee victory. I am calling upon you for political and material support.
I encourage each of you to step forward to help us preserve and protect chiropractic for now and the future. The nation will be closely monitoring the outcome of these deliberations, since the impact of the Texas decisions will certainly resonate across the country.
Our patients are relying upon us and we shall not let them down. Failure is not an option. I hope I can count on you to join the fight when the battle lines are formed.
May our credo be "Semper Fidelis" (Always Faithful) as we enter this contest.
References
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
