When it comes to health care reform, everyone has a cure for what ails the country's current system.
More than 100 pieces of health care reform legislation have been introduced in the House and Senate this session. Some address specific issues, such as long-term care or insurance for the self-employed or unemployed; others propose broad changes in the basic structure of the health care system.
Three approaches will be at the center of the debate:
Employers would be required to pay 80 percent of their employees' insurance premiums. Premiums for self-employed individuals would be 100 percent tax deductible. (The current deduction for self-employed individuals is 25 percent).
The government would subsidize insurance for low-income workers and the unemployed. All U.S. citizens and legal aliens would be covered by 1997. The Medicare and Medicaid systems would continue to be administered separately, and veterans and Indians would be eligible for benefits under existing programs.
States would have the authority to establish single-payer systems.
Republican Plans
Employers would be required to provide, but not pay for, their employees' health insurance. Self-employed individuals and those who have to buy their own insurance would be able to deduct 100 percent of the premiums.
Under the House GOP plan, states could use certain Medicaid funds to provide health plans for and provide subsidies to the poorest Americans, and they would be encouraged to establish group insurance plans for low-income workers and retirees.
The House GOP plan does not purport to achieve universal coverage; the Senate GOP plan sets it as a goal for the year 2000.
McDermott Plan
Upon enactment, the federal government would provide health insurance for all Americans, with benefits distributed at the state level. HR 1200 would virtually eliminate the need for private insurance companies; the government would collect premiums through payroll tax deductions. State and employers could provide extra benefits at their own cost.
Most current federal health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, would be folded into the single-payer plan. Veterans and Indians would have access to health care benefits through existing programs.
Insurance premiums would be capped, and national health spending would be limited by the federal government. Spending through Medicare, Medicaid and other federal benefits programs would be capped. Doctors would use a single billing form. The plan also advocates limited malpractice and antitrust reform to help control costs.
Republican Plans
Both GOP plans would seek to control costs by, among other things:
State governments would negotiate annually with doctors and medical facilities to determine payment caps for all medical services. (All appendectomies in Montana would cost $1,000 in any given year, for example.)
In addition to caps on Medicare and Medicaid spending, the money may come from increased taxes on cigarettes and alcohol, as well as on some large corporations. Companies that employ Medicare and Medicaid recipients would have to assume some of their coverage costs.
Republican Plans
The Senate plan would limit Medicare and Medicaid growth to seven percent a year, the House plan would pay for itself by raising the minimum federal retirement age from 55 to 62 and phasing out Medicare subsidies for the wealthiest recipients.
McDermott Plan
The federal government would pay 85 percent of health care costs by increasing hospital, payroll and individual income taxes. States would be responsible for raising the other 15 percent.
Insurance would be permanent and portable. No one would lose insurance after a job change or loss and no one would be denied treatment because of pre-existing conditions.
Republican Plans
All health insurance policies would be permanent and guaranteed renewable. Also, people who leave a job would be guaranteed coverage under that employer's plan at virtually the same price until they became eligible for coverage under another plan.
McDermott Plan
Patients would no longer have to get advance approval for medical procedures from insurance companies, and no one would be denied treatment because of pre-existing conditions.
Individuals would be grouped into some 200 regional health alliances, with the freedom to choose from at least several health care plans offered by each alliance. Some managed care plans would require consumers to use only those health care providers who participate in the plan.
Republican Plans
Individuals would have the same freedom to choose doctors or hospitals that they have under the current system, with restrictions set only by their specific health plans.
McDermott Plan
Using their health card, patients would be allowed to seek services from any doctor or medical facility approved by the government.
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
