Chiropractors since D.D. Palmer1 have insisted that adjustive intervention is a remedy for children who wet the bed. However, there is no substantive experimental evidence to support this contention. On the contrary, there seems to be growing reason to believe that adjusting has no effect in this pediatric disorder, although a good case can be made that an adequate trial has yet to be conducted. Leboeuf et al.,2 and Reed et al.,3 who have provided the only large scale trials of adjusting for enuresis, were not able to produce permanent arrest of enuresis beyond what would be expected on the basis of maturation and spontaneous remission. Several caveats apply, in that interns have been employed as adjusters and might therefore provide less than skilled care, and because the duration of care in these studies has been rather brief, certainly of lesser duration that would be recommended for the well-established behavioral methods for bedwetters.4
Surely, there is room for further study, but there is also good reason to be cautious in making claims for enuresis. Unfortunately, many in the profession have not been critical in asserting the utility of manipulation for the relief of bedwetting. The several case reports of enuresis and related lower urinary tract dysfunctions5-8 that are available have been overweighted,9 and a larger study2 (n=171 patients) has been trivialized as a "small group".5 Fysh10 has suggested that "all children who are bedwetters [should be] evaluated for the possibility of spinal problems as underlying cause."
Why should all children who bedwet have their spines examined? Peet11 offers the traditional wisdom that "improper nerve supply to the bladder can cause enuresis," but I am unaware of data to suggest that subluxation is an etiology for enuresis. Perhaps there is some unique spinal dysfunction that predisposes to enuresis, but Barge12 indicates his inability to identify an enuresis-causing subluxation:
"-- there is really no way to tell if a child is simply slow in the development of the phrenic reflex, or if a subluxation is the direct cause of the problem. Chiropractic x-rays and examination can help pinpoint spinal problems, but the only real way to see if chiropractic care will help nocturnal enuresis is to actually try it."
Irrespective of whether one can justify radiating children's spines to determine the adjustment-worthiness of a health problem that responds readily to other, more conservative health care methods (i.e., behavioral intervention), one is still left to wonder what should be adjusted. Some DCs have adopted a strategy involving adjustment of whatever seems to be fixed, subluxated or otherwise adjustment-worthy.2 Others have suggested "keys" to spinal manipulation in enuresis. For instance, Peet11 recommends attention to the atlas-axis, the second and third sacral segments, and any apparently relevant level of the lumbar spine. Similarly, Carl S. Cleveland Sr., DC, long-time faculty member and administrator at the National College of Chiropractic in the first half of the chiropractic century, advised doctors to attend to the 11th and 12th thoracic, the first, second and fifth lumbar and the sacroiliac joints.14 Another osteopath, Robuck,8 also believed that the lower lumbar vertebrae and the sacroiliac joints were affected in bedwetters, and noted the significance that Andrew T. Still, father of osteopathy, had attributed to the proper function of the symphysis pubis in enuresis. Gemmell and Jacobson6 noted their attention to the lumbosacral junction in the patient under their care, while Fysh10 and Borregard15 mention the sacral segments in childhood dysfunction of the lower urinary tract. Parra and Bonci13 noted that Clarence Gonstead, DC, attributed enuresis to dysfunction of the second sacral segment, while Australian chiropractor McKellow7 thought that the ilium should be attended to.
So what's the answer? What should the DC adjust to help children who chronically wet the bed? Glib answers might include "the spine" or "somewhere between heads and tails." In truth, however, no one knows, nor are there strong clinical science reasons to believe that enuretics need be adjusted at all. Moreover, in light of the miserable results that our preliminary studies of this phenomenon have suggested, the more conservative (compared to ionizing radiation) and demonstrably more effective procedures of the behavioral psychologist16-20 ought to be the preferred course, at least at this moment in time. Again, it's not impossible that future research, using skilled, experienced, licensed chiropractors rather than interns (if there are any DCs out there who are willing to commit their time for a controlled trial), in well planned trials conducted over longer periods of time (perhaps six months rather than a few weeks) and with outcome measures based upon thorough review of the literature4 ... it is not impossible that future research may suggest the relative benefit of adjustive care vs. other conservative interventions.
But what should the DC adjust at this point in time? Attitude! I know, we've been talking for nearly a century about how chiropractic is a "well developed science," but that's nonsense. But the old war stories will not carry us much further. Certainly, few if any scientists are swayed by such rhetoric, and third-party payers are not impressed. Moreover, if chiropractic's market share (10 percent of the population?) is any index, the traditional chiropractic rhetoric has not been very convincing to the general public. Write it off to abuse by organized medicine if you wish, but we've been strutting around without data for nearly a century, and we still have only 10 percent of the market. The best press we've ever received has come on the coat tails of research by non-chiropractors.21
If we won't even consider that a problem like childhood nocturnal enuresis may be more amenable to other approaches, even in the face of hard data, than we have no chance of maturing as a legitimate health science discipline. If the best we can do is wave our silent-killer subluxation flag in front of the television audience, then we shouldn't expect much from society. Perhaps we should wonder if we deserve more?
Then again, who cares? It just WORKS!
References
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
