Ever wonder why so many parents are searching for a cure for their child's ear infections? Why don't they get the relief they seek from antibiotics? One possible answer may be the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics for acute otitis media (AOM) and otitis media effusion (OME).
A recent issue of Research Activities, published by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), contained the article, "Preventitive antibiotics for middle ear infections have limited benefit." According to the article, "The cost of treating chronic middle ear infections in children in the United States exceeds $3.5 billion a year." Antibiotics are the usual initial course of treatment, but how effective are they?
"Researchers at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and the Harvard School of Public Health, supported in part by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (HS05936), analyzed 27 studies conducted between 1966 and 1993 to determine the efficacy of antibiotics for preventing recurrent AOM and treating OME in children. They found that prophylactic antibiotics do prevent further episodes of AOM, but the magnitude of the effect is limited, with only one in nine children showing an improved outcome.This is yet another example of treating the symptoms rather than the cause. With antibiotics only benefiting 11 percent of the AOM sufferers and only 16 percent of the OME, it is easy to see why parents are searching for a better solution."A short course of antibiotics appears to be effective for OME for short-term clearance of effusion. However, the effect is limited; only one in six patients has an improved outcome, and the improvement only lasts for about 1 month, not enough time to affect speech development. More recent studies suggest that antibiotics offer even fewer short-term benefits, including studies with placebo controls. The researchers note, however, that it may be unreasonable to expect a brief course of antibiotics to produce lasting benefits in this condition, given the continued role of eustachian tube dysfunction involved in the development of OME."
While there is no shortage of projects facing the research community, the need for an effective treatment in pediatric patients is enormous. Perhaps our chiropractic college research departments can be persuaded to make this a priority.
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
