The shoulder girdle is a rather complicated structure to evaluate on plain films. Small fractures and mild degenerative changes can be overlooked on a standard shoulder series. Among the areas commonly overlooked or difficult to evaluate is the acromioclavicular joint, which is often "burnt out" or over-penetrated on the shoulder series. The best way to evaluate the acromioclavicular articulation is with an angled view and a slightly decreased x-ray technique. Figure 1 demonstrates the positioning for this view. The patient is standing with the arm in the neutral position and the central beam is directed 15o cephalad toward the clavicle. As over-exposure of the film is common, reduce the radiographic factors by about 33 percent from the standard AP shoulder view.
Another area that is difficult to evaluate on a standard shoulder series is the glenoid fossa. It generally is overlapped by the head of the humerus. The good view for evaluating the glenoid is by positioning the patient as in Figure 2, where the patient is angled about 40o toward the side of interest and the central beam is directed toward the glenohumeral joint. Another structure which is difficult to evaluate is the scapula.
Figure 3 demonstrates the patient positioning for the trans-scapular or Y view of the shoulder. The patient faces the buckey and is rotated about 20o from the buckey, with the shoulder of interest closest to the buckey. The arm on the side of interest is slightly abducted and the elbow flexed. In other words, put the patient's hand on their hip. The central beam is directed toward the medial border of the protruding scapula. There are many more complicated views of the shoulder but these are very easy to perform, even if the patient is symptomatic. If there is still a question of pathology, even with these extra views, special studies may be necessary.
Because they have yet to pass national legislation protecting the chiropractic profession, Japanese DCs are in a similar situation that U.S. DCs faced. We were fortunate enough to be able to pass chiropractic licensure state by state. The DCs in Japan must accomplish this nationally, which has proved to be an extremely difficult task. And in spite of their efforts, Japanese DCs are currently faced with two chiropractic professions.
This article focuses on nine severe injuries that are generally not diagnosable until the third to fourth week following the date of injury, including how to diagnose these severe injuries. The discovery of any of these injuries early can make a significant difference in the case outcome.
There has long been an attempt by those who are not legitimate doctors of chiropractic to usurp the title of chiropractor from those who have earned their degree from an accredited chiropractic program. This generally happens in countries where the local doctors of chiropractic have yet to pass legislation requiring a degree from an accredited institution. The result is essentially two chiropractic professions. Nowhere is this danger more pronounced than in Japan.
