A new study will investigate the value of nonsurgical spinal decompression for chronic low back pain among adult patients ages 18-65. Patients will be divided into two groups for comparison, with the intervention group receiving 20 decompression sessions utilizing a spinal decompression device,1 and a control group receiving sham decompression (equivalent frequency / time frame as the intervention group).
The study, funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command (USAMRDC), will be conducted at the University of South Florida, with Stanford University serving as consultation support for MRI image analysis. Nathan D Schilaty, DC, PhD, will serve as principal investigator, with Kenneth A. Weber II, DC, PhD, as the MRI consultant.2
Dr. Schilaty, a 2007 DC graduate of Parker University, is the Lincoln Endowed Chair of Chiropractic & Biomechanics Research, director of the Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Research, and assistant professor of neurosurgery and medical engineering at USF.
Specifically, “This project will implement a small-scale double-blinded, randomized proof-of-concept clinical trial to gather biomechanical and MRI data that will objectively determine the effectiveness of non-surgical spinal decompression (NSSD) over a 12-week longitudinal timeframe.3
Inclusion criteria for the clinical trial include chronic low back pain (minimum of three months) not attributable to a known serious spinal pathology, CNS involvement, or other chronic pain conditions, among other exclusions.
Pre-Intervention Assessments
“Assessments prior to intervention will include 1) 3D motion capture performing functional tasks, 2) electromyography of the lower back and legs, 3) [myotonometry], 4) range of motion, and 5) sensorimotor reflex measurement. In addition, the [participants] will complete online questionnaires that include the Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale 2.0, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Physical Function, Central Sensitization Inventory, and the Oswestry Disability Index.”3
Post-Intervention Assessments
“Assessments after intervention will include 1) 3D motion capture performing functional tasks, 2) electromyography of the lower back and legs, 3) [myotonometry], 4) range of motion, and 5) Sensorimotor reflex measurement. In addition, the [participants] will complete online questionnaires that include the Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale 2.0, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Physical Function, Central Sensitization Inventory, and the Oswestry Disability Index.”3
References
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
