Donald M. Petersen Jr., BS, HCD(hc), FICC(h), Publisher
The New England Journal of Medicine just published a follow-up article to a 1991 study on health-care administrative costs in the United States and Canada.1,2 What the investigators found was outrageous:
In 1971, 16% of Canada's labor force consisted of health-care administrative workers. By 1996, that percentage had grown to 19.1%.
In 1969, 18.2% of the U.S. workforce consisted of health care administrators. That number jumped to 27.3% by 1999.
In 1987, Canada spent $150 per person on health care administration. In that same year, the U.S. spent $450 - three times as much - per person.2
By 1999, health care administration in Canada had risen to $307 per person. In that same year, the cost per person in the U.S. was $1,059, almost 3 1/2 times as much.
Health care administration in Canada accounted for 16.7% of health care expenditures in 1999. That number was almost double in the U.S. - 31.0% of health care expenditures were spent on administration.
So, do you want to know where the excess costs are in U.S. health care?
It's in the almost $300 BILLION we spent on administration in 1999 (undoubtedly much higher today.) Compared to what Canada spent, we wasted almost $210 billion in 1999 alone.
Take a good look at the graph above to see where we wasted the money:
The researchers draw the obvious conclusion: "The difference in the costs of health care administration between the United States and Canada is clearly large and growing."
Ironically, the growth in health-care administrative costs coincides with the expansion of managed care. This should not be a huge surprise, in that most DCs have experienced a marked increase in "paperwork" requirements and related expenses. Needless to say, if we have to generate more paperwork, more people will be required on the payer end to read it and file it.
This is probably one of the reasons for the forthcoming implementation of electronic claims processing according to universal (HIPAA) standards. Our hope is that our computers will reduce the costs of paperwork inherent in our U.S. health care system.
But this message still needs to be made clear to the policy-makers who are currently considering eliminating health care benefits because they are too costly. They need to understand it's our health care system that's too costly, not the health care provided.
References
Woolhandler S, Campbell T, Himmelstein DU. Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 2003;349:768-75.
Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. The deteriorating administrative efficiency of the U.S. health care system. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1253-8. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 1994;331:336.]
While there may be no “magic bullet” when it comes to health, this should not dissuade patients or practitioners from seeking out ingredients that offer multiple health benefits. When it comes to dietary supplements, there are thousands upon thousands of choices. So, why not choose one that can address pain and assist with mental health? A supplement that can address inflammation, while also preventing certain types of cancer.
This article focuses on nine severe injuries that are generally not diagnosable until the third to fourth week following the date of injury, including how to diagnose these severe injuries. The discovery of any of these injuries early can make a significant difference in the case outcome.
While canes, braces and posts represent extrinsic methods for lessening adductor moment arms, an intrinsic method for lessening the development of medial knee osteoarthritis occurs when the hip abductor musculature and the iliotibial band are strong enough to create a compressive force capable of stabilizing the lateral knee.
