The Lancet Low Back Pain Working Group consists of a team of leading international experts on back pain from different professional backgrounds and from countries around the globe. The group published a series of three papers in The Lancet on March 21, 2018, and have subsequently received significant media attention. Here is a summary of the relevant data from these three important papers.
Pt. 1: "What Low Back Pain Is and Why We Need to Pay Attention"1
Epidemiology: In 2015, the global point prevalence of activity-limiting low back pain was 7.3 percent, or 540 million people. Low back pain is now the No. 1 cause of disability globally. The most recent WHO Global Burden of Disease document (2015) indicates this disorder is the No. 1cause of disability globally.
Clinical Course: A large systematic review provides strong evidence that most episodes of low back pain improve substantially within six weeks, and by 12 months average pain levels are low (six points on a 100-point scale).
However, 67 percent of patients still report some pain at three months, and 65 percent at 12 months. Another 2017 systematic review found that approximately 33 percent of people would experience a recurrence of low back pain within 12 months of recovering from a previous episode.
Socioeconomic Predictors: Those who completed less than a high-school education and have an annual household income less than $20,000 are most likely to suffer from persistent low back pain. Suggested mechanisms for these risk factors include environmental and lifestyle exposures in lower socioeconomic groups, lower health literacy, and decreased access to health care. Also, being in manual occupations and having increased physical workloads is associated with disabling low back pain.
Additional predictors of poor prognosis include: number of previous episodes; higher intensity of pain; presence of leg pain; high BMI; smoking; lack of physical activity; depression; catastrophising; fear avoidance beliefs; work satisfaction.
Pt. 2: "Prevention and Treatment of Low Back Pain: Evidence, Challenges, and Promising Directions"2
The vast majority of widely promoted interventions (e.g., workplace education, no-lift policies, ergonomic furniture, mattresses, back belts, lifting devices) to prevent low back pain are not supported by research evidence. The most widely accepted clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic low back pain are:
There are significant gaps present between recommendations in these guidelines and the reality of clinical practice. The main gap, according to the working group, is the "overuse of low-value care and underuse of high-value care." Additional evidence-practice gaps highlighted include:
Some of the key challenges to implementing best practices for low back pain include inadequate consultation time, poor knowledge of clinical guidelines, practicing defensive medicine and the desire to fulfill the wishes of patients.
The most intriguing solution proposed to address the low back pain crisis was to reconfigure the entire LBP clinical pathway, from first contact through to specialized care. This has huge potential benefit to the chiropractic profession, as we are perfectly suited to act as the first-contact provider for these patients. The primary spine provider program, currently running at the University of Pittsburgh,3 offers a certification for chiropractors and physical therapists promoting such an approach.
Pt. 3: "Low Back Pain: A Call for Action"4
The three-part series ends with a call for action to meet the challenges associated with preventing disabling low back pain in three domains: political, public health and health care.
Our Opportunity
This series of papers did an excellent job framing the global low back pain crisis. Popular television shows ran headlines such as "New Report Warns of Widespread Ineffectiveness of Lower Back Pain Treatments."5 Patients, along with the health care system in general, are begging for a better solution to this crisis. Is the chiropractic profession willing to step up and take a more prominent role to fill this need?
References
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
