QUESTION: I've heard Medicare will exempt offices from doing outcome reporting (PQRS, MACRA, MIPS) and/or use of electronic health records. I am curious as to whether this is true or only a rumor. I do not have EHR, as the cost is too high, and I also have difficulty complying with the G codes for PQRS.
What you've heard is not a rumor – there will be exemptions for providers of Medicare patients, with no penalties assessed for offices that do not do Quality Payment Program (EHR, PQRS, MACRA and MIPS) reporting. The exemptions are as follows:
For chiropractic offices, the third exemption likely applies, as per CMS, 89 percent of chiropractors are paid less than $30,000. If you are under $30,000 annually, you will be paid the Medicare rate with no reductions.
However, this year, a provider may still suffer as much as a 5 percent reduction of fees for noncompliance with electronic health records (EHR) and Physician Quality Reporting Standards (PQRS). The reduction for nonuse of EHR is 3 percent and for PQRS 2 percent (5 percent reduction for both).
Note the reduction for PQRS is for the 2015 reporting year. That means if you did PQRS in 2016, but not in 2015, the reduction you see this year is related to 2015 reporting. (PQRS reporting from 2016 is for 2018.)
Participation or Exemption? Do a Cost-Benefit Analysis
I certainly understand your reasons for nonuse of EHR purely based on cost. A compliant system with necessary hardware can cost several thousand dollars up front, as well as annual fees that can range from $100s to $1,000s. While electronic health notes may be useful, the cost must be considered based on cost-benefit ratio.
If Medicare were reducing your fees this year for EHR at 3 percent, that would amount to approximately 90 cents to $1.50 per visit. Assuming the EHR system cost in the first year is $3,500, that would require at least 2,500-3,500 Medicare visits to break even. Therefore, it may not be a wise choice from a business perspective. Of course, if notes are easier to document and assist with compliance, that may outweigh the cost.
The same holds for PQRS or outcome reporting: Although there is no direct cost, the added time for staff and doctor to report may be a consideration. Avoiding the 2 percent reduction (60 cents to $1 per visit) may not be worth the added work required to report.
Don't Forget to Consider the Reporting Incentive
However, if you do provide the required information under the Quality Payment Program, you can receive a bonus, which may be enough to offset the cost of an electronic health records (EHR) system. The incentive or bonus payments can be as high as 4 percent in 2018-19; 5 percent in 2020; 7 percent in 2021; and 9 percent in 2022.
Doing simple math, if your office is fully compliant and you do $30,000 a year in Medicare, you could receive as much as $1,200 (4 percent bonus) to $2,700 (9 percent bonus) per year. This may be attractive enough to be compliant, assuming your initial and annual costs are less than the incentive payment.
The good news for EHR users is that Medicare's new Quality Payment Program (MACRA, MIPS, etc.) rules do not include the "meaningful use" rule the administration previously used to decide if providers should be rewarded for using electronic health records. However, doctors will still be accountable for using health information technology under the "advancing care information" performance category per the rule that counts 25 percent toward a physician's overall score for the category.
This reporting is not a hard cost and requires only a verbal pain scale and outcome forms completed by the patient; and may aid in demonstrating medical necessity in functional fashion. This style of reporting can assist in issues of necessity should Medicare review the dates of services, as it does indicate changes as a result of care. But certainly time can be valued for cost, regardless of no direct monetary outlay.
So, the good news for you and offices like yours is that moving forward, you can be exempt and will not be penalized. The current system only punishes and reduces, whereas this new rule simply allows smaller providers / offices to be exempt. No penalties – but also no bonuses.
Editor's Note: Feel free to submit billing questions to Mr. Collins at sam@hjrossnetwork.com. Your question may be the subject of a future column.
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
