October 30, 1990
Dr. Steven Pappas, Executive Director
National Advisor Committee on
Accreditation and Institutional Eligibility
United States Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20202
Dear Dr. Pappas:
I write to express to the National Advisory Committee my interest in their consideration of the possible renewal of recognition for the Straight Chiropractic Academic Standards Association (SCASA).
My concerns over the initial recognition of SCASA by the secretary of education are already on record. I believe the recognition action of Secretary Bennett was ill-considered, unjustified, and incorrect. It has raised doubt about the integrity of the secretary's recognition process.
SCASA now comes before the National Advisory Committee for the first time since its initial recognition. The integrity of the secretary's recognition and the health of the accreditation commuity requires the consideration be forthright and clearly focused on the criteria for recognition as contained in the regulations.
Irrelevant issues raised in earlier committee hearings on SCASA have clouded effective consideration of the recognition criteria. Among these issues are the relationships among different schools of chiropractic. I trust that at the hearing next month the committee will resist any effort to introduce such extraneous issues into the discussion. The question before the committee is whether SCASA meets the recognition criteria; other issues are not germane to the committee's recommendation and the secretary's decision.
I have confidence in the ability and integrity of the committee in reaching its recommendation. My purpose in writing is simply to underscore that its deliberations cannot be merely routine. The initial recognition action was seriously defective. Many do not think that SCASA demonstrated compliance with the secretary's criteria at the time of initial recognition. If SCASA does not now demonstrate that it meets the criteria, SCASA's recognition should be withdrawn.
When I graduated from chiropractic college in 1981 and started practice, I heard it all, and very little was positive. “You are a quack; you do not know what a subluxation is; you couldn’t get into a real health care program, so you chose the one that is slightly above a mail-order degree; you have no proof that chiropractic works; Are you really licensed?”, and so much more.
| Digital Exclusive
A central challenge in creating our identity is that chiropractic is a method of care, not a technique or procedure. This is an important concept for us to promote. Our patients are treated with lifestyle modification, exercise, nutritional supplements, diet and a whole-body approach to accelerate the natural healing process. We are not simply CMT providers.
The results of a global survey released late last year (2023) unveiled some startling findings among medical and nursing students. The “Clinician of the Future: 2023 Education Edition” surveyed 2,212 students, of which 446 were in the United States, from 91 countries.
