In previous columns I've written about crashworthiness of modern cars. As you know, federal motor vehicle safety standards require manufacturers to perform 30 mph frontal and offset crash tests using instrumented dummies. Most of these tests are performed by crashing cars into fixed barriers. In recent years, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), concerned that many crashes actually occur at higher speeds, have recommended higher speed crash tests. Their New Car Assessment Program, which is not mandatory, assesses crashworthiness at slightly higher speeds (35 mph) and assigns a star rating system based on the results. Five stars is the highest award and is associated with the lowest likelihood of fatal or serious injury. You may have noticed that several manufacturers mention their five-star rating in their advertisements.
These ratings, however, can be misleading. Because crashing a car into a fixed barrier is essentially the same as crashing it into another car with the same mass, the star rating system says nothing about how that car will fare when colliding with another car with, for example, greater mass. In fact, cars with smaller mass will always be less safe than cars of greater mass. A passenger in a car that collides with another car that is 50% larger will have 2-5 times the risk of death, depending on the model year and a few other variables.
This truth creates some degree of conflict with both NHTSA and environmental groups because the new corporate automotive fuel economy ruling requires that manufacturers meet fuel economy requirements for their fleets. This means that gas guzzlers can still be produced as long as most of the fleet have better fuel efficiency. Moreover, the single largest growing class of vehicles is the utility sports vehicle, which are generally equipped with large motors and exempt from some of the emission rules because they are not classified as passenger cars. Nevertheless, their higher mass provides a margin of safety in crashes.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) takes crash testing to new highs, and has recently released the results of their 40 mph crash tests of six large luxury models: the BMW 5 series, Lexus LS 400, Mercedes E class, Lincoln Continental, Infiniti Q45, and Cadillac Seville. The overall winners were the BMW 5 series and the Lexus LS 400. The Cadillac Seville came in dead last. The following is a summary of the results of the frontal offset crash tests:
| Structure: | good |
| Restraints/dummy kinematics: | good |
Injury Measures:
| Head/neck | good |
| Chest | good |
| Leg/foot, left | good |
| Leg/foot, right | good |
| Head restraint design: | marginal* |
| Bumper performance: | poor |
| Structure: | good |
| Restraints/dummy kinematics | good |
Injury Measures:
| Head/neck | good |
| Chest | good |
| Leg/foot, left | good |
| Leg/foot, right | good |
| Head restraint design: | marginal |
| Bumper performance: | poor |
| Structure: | good |
| Restraints/dummy kinematics | poor |
Injury Measures:
| Head/neck | good |
| Chest | good |
| Leg/foot, left | good |
| Leg/foot, right | good |
| Head restraint design: | good |
| Bumper performance: | poor |
| Structure: | acceptable |
| Restraints/dummy kinematics | good |
Injury Measures:
| Head/neck | acceptable |
| Chest | good |
| Leg/foot, left | poor |
| Leg/foot, right | acceptable |
| Head restraint design: | poor |
| Bumper performance: | good |
| Structure: | acceptable |
| Restraints/dummy kinematics | marginal |
Injury Measures:
| Head/neck | marginal |
| Chest | good |
| Leg/foot, left | marginal |
| Leg/foot, right | acceptable |
| Head restraint design: | marginal |
| Bumper performance: | poor |
| Structure: | poor |
| Restraints/dummy kinematics | poor |
Injury Measures:
| Head/neck | good |
| Chest | good |
| Leg/foot, left | good |
| Leg/foot, right | poor |
| Head restraint design: | poor |
| Bumper performance: | acceptable |
Bumper performance was tested through a series of 5 mph crashes and tells more about the costs of repairing parking lot mishaps and low speed bumps. The most damaging of these are the crashes into poles which concentrate the energy into a small area of the bumper. In the case of the Lexus, the rear-into-pole test resulted in $3,000 of damage -- ouch!
For more information on this topic, contact the IIHS at [url=http://www.hwysafety.org]http://www.hwysafety.org[/url].
Arthur C. Croft, DC, MS, FACO
San Diego, California
dr_croft@4dcomm.com
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
