Anything that doesn't kill you outright makes you stronger, the old saying goes. This is an encouraging and uplifting notion when applied to courageous POWs surviving despite malnutrition and mistreatment, to accident victims found alive after a plane crash or earthquake, or to ordinary individuals with the fortitude to succeed despite seemingly insurmountable social and economic disadvantages. It is an appropriate description of the positive benefits of overcoming adversity and becoming a better person by building your character and your coping skills. It is also terrifyingly true of bacteria. Bacteria not only survive our antibiotic assaults on them, but grow into ever-stronger pathogens that threaten our health.
The development of antibiotics (antimicrobial agents) is usually included with radio, television, computers, genetic engineering and space travel as one of the landmarks of scientific achievement in the twentieth century (and even of the second millennium). As the century comes to a close, there is growing evidence, horrific and irrefutable, that antibiotics are strengthening the very disease-causing microbes they were created to target and destroy. These dire warnings have been featured in recent articles and editorials in such prestigious journals as the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Antibiotics do kill bacteria by the billions. Unfortunately, the process that kills most of a particular species of microbe can leave some mutant germs, which have a natural resistance to the antibiotic that wiped out their weaker relatives. This process of natural selection, by which humans create better bugs while eradicating less-adaptive ones, is fundamental to evolution, the natural process by which new species emerge and survive because they are better able to cope with a changed environment. In the twentieth-century environment of hospitals, clinics and nursing homes, and such in-patient and out-patient facilities as dialysis centers, antibiotics are regularly overprescribed and often indiscriminately dispensed. As a result, better microbes are constantly being created and thrive. What makes them better is their resistance to the antibiotics that helped bring them into existence. Being "better" in this way, makes existence much worse for human beings who are afflicted by them.
In the few decades since penicillin began to give humans apparent mastery over microbial infections, many new and seemingly stronger antibiotics have been developed to counter more diseases and overcome germs' resistance to earlier antibiotics. For a time, synthetically produced penicillin (methicillin) and combinations of antibiotics appeared to have bacterial infections in check. More-resistant bacterial strains have appeared. For the last two decades, vancomycin has been seen as the only drug that could be depended on to eradicate Staphylococcus aureus, a microbe that commonly infects hospital patients already weakened by illness or surgery.2
In 1996, the first case of a patient infected with avancomycin-resistant strain of S. aureus was reported in Japan.3-4 In the last two years, similarly resistant S. aureus strainshave appeared in the United States in patients who had beentreated with vancomycin. The vancomycin-resistant microbes in thefirst two U.S. patients were wiped out by a combination ofvancomycin and other drugs, but both patients still died. Thesewere only the initial encounters with what could become anonslaught affecting the in-patient and out-patient medicalfacilities of entire cities.5-6 They should raise an alarm thatall health care professionals must heed, because "the emergenceof such resistance could produce morbidity and mortality similarto that caused by S. aureus infections in the era beforeantibiotics became available."1
The natural selection of drug-resistant bacteria is a result of the unnatural and unnecessary overuse of powerful antibiotics that rapidly alter microbes in ways that are becoming harder to overcome. Merely creating yet-more-powerful drugs only leads to yet-more-powerful bacterial adversaries that may dispatch first the infected who are old, sick, infirm and institutionalized. Such "super bugs" could eventually be virtually unstoppable and begin incapacitating and decimating younger and otherwise healthier people.
All health care and public health professionals must be educated to implement guidelines for prescribing and dispensing antibiotics and even issuing "antibiotic stop orders" when appropriate.3 They must strive to use antibiotics only in the most judicious manner, to employ programs to detect antibiotic resistance and take all steps necessary to limit contagion. 7-8
Chiropractors can protect and empower their patients by counseling them to demand judicious use of antibiotics. Patients must learn to ask doctors some critical questions when medications are prescribed for them or their loved ones:
Chiropractors and now biomedical scientists are clearly enlisted in the war against injudicious use of antibiotics. But the war can be won only if medical clinicians, the MDs who are empowered to prescribe antibiotics, accept their responsibility for reducing overuse of antimicrobials. They decide if antibiotics are indicated. They must make the day-by-day, patient-by-patient decisions to stop the dangerous practice of using antibiotics as cure-alls--when the facts show they may be helping create bacteria that nothing can cure.
References
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
