The managed care industry is gasping for its collective breath in the aftermath of a jury verdict against Aetna, the nation's largest health plan, for $116 million in punitive damages and 4.5 million in medical damages.
The civil suit was filed by Yucaipa, California kindergarten teacher Teresa Goodrich. Her husband, David, a deputy district attorney in San Bernardino, California, had died at the age of 44 in 1995 of a rare stomach cancer. Mrs. Goodrich's suit contended Aetna had refused to pay for her husband's treatments, even though that care was authorized by Aetna doctors.
David Goodrich died believing his wife was left with $750,000 in medical expenses.
In the two-month trial, the jury of 10 women and two men, found that Aetna HMO acted with malice, oppression and fraud in its treatment of David Goodrich.
Health care experts said the San Bernardino Superior Court decision will help inflame the debate in Congress over whether patients should have the right to sue their health plans. Most patients currently do not that right.
The victorious attorney, Michael Bidart, who specializes in managed care law, in perhaps the understatement of the year, said the verdict would send shock waves throughout the HMO industry. This verdict follows other significant managed care verdicts against HMOs:
The federal law which the ACA has vigorously lobbied to reform, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), allows most people to recover only for the medical bills. Victims of HMO malfeasance can only sue for their health care benefits, and few attorneys accept those cases because of the low threshold of recovery.
In the Aetna case, the ERISA statute had no bearing. The ERISA laws do not apply to: individuals who buy medical policies; government officials (David Goodrich was a deputy district attorney); or those who work for nonprofit organizations.
Aetna, of course, said they would vigorously appeal the decision. Aetna's counsel, Hugh Helm (L.A. law firm of Galton and Helm) could not be reached for comment.
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
