As the Consortial Center for Chiropractic Research (CCCR) closes in on its last year of support from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), it is good to consider the impact that federal funding has had on the overall chiropractic research effort. Originally, there were 12 specific aims that the CCCR was required to address, most of them falling into the areas of research capacity building, training and assisting chiropractic investigators, and reviewing, prioritizing and funding small pilot studies.
One of the overarching expectations was that the CCCR develop effective scientific collaborations between chiropractic scientists and experienced researchers in established research centers. This not only meant that we had to facilitate relationships between individuals, but that our institutions had to develop the administrative expertise to produce formal project subcontracts and related business agreements. For anyone who has attempted to handle a grant, there is much to do that has little to do with the specifics of the scientific project itself. The CCCR has been able to demonstrate the profession's ability in this regard.
To date, the CCCR has lived up to its consortial goal by involving seven chiropractic and six nonchiropractic institutions on its various functions. An additional seven chiropractic colleges (75 percent of North American chiropractic colleges in all) have participated in the CCCR (at least) by submitting pilot project applications and obtaining expert feedback. The most potent form of training is when investigators have their applications reviewed and critiqued by a set of experts. In fact, the CCCR has provided expert review for 64 applications, and has been able to financially support the best 19 to date.
In all cases of funded projects, including nonchiropractic institutions, chiropractic scientists are intimately involved. For example: Partap Khalsa, a chiropractor with a PhD in bioengineering, has developed his own bioengineering laboratory at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, where he has a faculty appointment. With funds from the CCCR, he has been able to pursue exciting work on the biomechanics of spinal facet joints.
As far as additional assistance and training goes, the Research Agenda Conference (RAC) is partially supported by funds from the CCCR, and this has become, in seven years, one of the most effective and productive scientific/education meetings in chiropractic. Other health professions are now trying to emulate the formula. The Research Agenda Conference is primarily funded by a contract from the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration. Next year, as in the most previous event, the RAC will be held in conjunction with the annual conference of the Association of Chiropractic Colleges in March. (Stay tuned to this publication for details.)
In the past year, the following new projects have been initiated and are in progress. Space is limited to the title of the project, the names of two key investigators and the primary institution; but be aware that each project involves a great many more individuals important to its success. In some cases, the projects also involve more than one institution. Here are some featured topics and their presenters:
Success is also measured by noting the publications and presentations sponsored by the CCCR. So far, and with over half of the CCCR's projects still underway, this outstanding group of chiropractic scientists has published 26 peer-reviewed papers (some of which are still "in press"), and has made 51 citable presentations at various research and professional conferences. Many of these publications are reaching audiences that have little previous experience with chiropractic or chiropractic research.
Only time will tell the extent of the impact of the CCCR on chiropractic research overall. Success has also thrown into relief the challenges that still need to be met to continue the scientific momentum that has served the profession well in the past decade. These issues include:
William Meeker,DC,MPH,FICC
Principal Investigator
Consortial Center for Chiropractic Research
Davenport, Iowa
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
