Several months ago, I discussed Senate passage of the Medicare chiropractic demonstration project (contained in S.1.) and detailed the obstacles that were hurdled just to get the provision "halfway" home. (See "Legislation and Landmines," Aug. 16 DC.)
Although it was a long, arduous process, I am thrilled to report that the chiropractic provision did indeed pass both houses of Congress and was signed into law by President Bush on December 8, 2003. This article is "part II" of how this truly historic chiropractic victory occurred, including discussion of the additional "landmines" placed in the profession's path by both the World Chiropractic Alliance (WCA) and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, MD.
The new law approves a groundbreaking provision that would allow - on a demonstration basis and by direct access - doctors of chiropractic to receive Medicare reimbursement for all services authorized by state law. The two-year demonstration project will be conducted in four sites throughout the United States. The data reflecting the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care will then be evaluated by Congress, hopefully leading to DCs being reimbursed for all services authorized by state law.
This was not easy, however. The first major "landmine" occurred when it was learned that the alliance was working to get the House-Senate Conference Committee to abandon the demonstration project, and instead substitute the "nonphysician" language contained in HR 2560 (the Manzullo bill). This harmful provision would have devastated doctors of chiropractic by relegating us to mid-level practitioners and drastically cutting reimbursement levels. I also learned that the person likely to spearhead this misguided effort was a powerful U.S. Senator who has always been a great friend of chiropractic.
I flew to Washington, D.C. to meet with the Senator's key staff member and alert her to the facts regarding the opposition's motives. Here are some of the key topics I covered during that meeting:
After dodging that catastrophe, the second "landmine" appeared when Dr. Frist challenged Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), by attempting to remove the chiropractic demonstration provision from the bill in conference.
Although many congressional leaders worked for passage of the chiropractic provision, there was no greater champion than Senator Grassley. For proof of Senator Grassley's commitment and tenacity, read the following excerpts from his news conference relating his confrontation with Senator Frist over the chiropractic issue (emphasis mine):
"... I can read to you an e-mail that I sent to Senator Frist...because I think it would tell you better how I am fighting for this, and what maybe some of the problems are...'I hope that this can be handled at the staff level' - In other words, what the implication that this sends is that we have had problems at the staff level - 'but your staff have been refusing my chiropractic demo.' I said, 'Knock it off! I have been fighting AMA for years to get crumbs off the table for chiropractors.' I got $54 billion for the docs in January. You and they better not object to budgetary asterisks for chiros. 'Budgetary asterisks' is a term around here when the CBO scores something as very insignificant in cost. 'The profession was born in Davenport, Iowa. My family uses chiropractors. I have been flexible on this bill, except for rural hospitals. So back your staff off of this demo, please, please.
"So that's how I lay down the marker on this issue now. Whether I get it or not, I don't know. But, you need to know, that presumably, the AMA is weighing in very heavily against that. They carry a lot of clout in this town, and I would have to say there isn't one supporter among the House conferees for what I want to do, and there is some support from Senate conferees for, but it is not unanimous. So numbers are kind of 'up against' me, but it doesn't mean I can't get it done. You must understand; it is not easy to do."
There is no question in my mind that Dr. Frist, on behalf of the AMA, had every intention of deleting the chiropractic provision in conference committee. And there is also no question that this powerful medical physician would have succeeded, had it not been for Senator Grassley, who bravely faced Dr. Frist down and was able to get him to "knock it off!"
I also want to mention the important work of Palmer President Dr. Guy Riekeman, the Palmer Chiropractic University System and the Iowa Chiropractic Society. All worked to support the demonstration project, and each played a key leadership role in building support for this historic legislation.
James Edwards, DC
Treasurer and District VI Governor
American Chiropractic Association
Austin, Texas
jamesedwards@jamesedwards.com
When sports chiropractors first appeared at the Olympic Games in the 1980s, it was alongside individual athletes who had experienced the benefits of chiropractic care in their training and recovery processes at home. Fast forward to Paris 2024, where chiropractic care was available in the polyclinic for all athletes, and the attitude has now evolved to recognize that “every athlete deserves access to sports chiropractic."
It is estimated that 61% of patients with CTS avoid taking surgical options due to postoperative complications and costly surgical procedures. Chiropractic care offers a comprehensive and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, addressing the condition from multiple angles. Recent studies also have unveiled a game-changing adjunct to chiropractic treatments for CTS: nerve flossing.
Some doctors thrive in a personality-based clinic and have a loyal following no matter what services or equipment they offer, but for most chiropractic offices who are trying to grow and expand, new equipment purchases help us stay relevant and continue to service our client base in the best, most up-to-date manner possible. So, regarding equipment purchasing: should you lease, get a bank loan, or pay cash?
